Trade-based technology transfer and Its Impact on the Iranian Economy: Using a CGE model

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

Assistant Professor in Economics, Department of Economics, Management and Economic Faculty, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of import of technology on Iranian Economy. We have used multi-sectoral and multi–regional computable general equilibrium GTAP model. Transfer of technology from one region to another is another factor effecting productivity. Trade is one of the channels that speeds the transfer of technology. The effect of a ten percent productivity shock, in high-tech industries of industrial countries have been tracked on economic sectors of Iran. The result show that productivity of high technology industrial sectors in Iran has increased by 3.6%, GDP has increased by 0.52%, while inflation decreased by 1.19% in the Iranian economy. The findings also include increases in real sectoral outputs and decrease in the imports.

Keywords


1. Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Aitken, B.J., and Harrison, A.E. (1999). ”Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela”, American Economic Review, Vol. 89, pp. 605–618.
3. Alfaroa, L., Chandab, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., and Sayek, S. (2004). ”FDI and Economic Growth: the Role of Local Financial Markets”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 64, pp. 89-112.
4. Barro, Robert J. and Jong-Wha Lee (1993). “International Comparisons of Educational Attainment", Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol, 32, pp. 363-394.

5. Blomstrom, M. and Kokko, A. (1998). ”Multinational Corporations and Spillovers’. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 12, pp. 247–277.
6. Blomström, M. and Kokko, A. (2003). “Human capital and inward FDI”, European Commission under the Training and Mobility of Researchers Programmed.
7. Borges, A.M. (1986). "Applied General Equilibrium Models: An Assessment of Their Usefulness for Policy Analysis", OECD Economic Studies, pp. 7-43.
8. Coe, David T. and Helpman, E. (1993). "International R&D Spillovers", CEPR Discussion Papers, No, 840.
9. Cohen, Wesley, M. and Levinthal, Daniel A. (1990). “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 128-152.
10. Damijan, J.P. Kostevc, C. Rojec, M., and Jaklic, A. (2007). ”The Effects of Own R&D and External Knowledge Spillovers on Firm Innovation and Productivity: The Case ofSlovenia”. In Proceedings of EIBA Conference, International Business, Local Development and Science-Technology Relationships.
11. Das, G. and Powell, A.L. (2000), “Absorption Capacity, Structural Similarity and Embodied Technology Spillovers in a ‘Macro’ Model: An Implementation within a Computable General Equilibrium Framework”, Korean J. Policy Studies, Vol. 16. pp. 111-132.
12. Das, G. Gopal. (2011). “How does Trade-Mediated Technology Transfer Affect Interregional and Intersectoral Competition? Exploring Multi-Sectoral Effects in a Global Trade Model”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5, pp. 5871-5886.
13. Dunning, J.H. (1973).“The Determinants of International Production”. Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 25, pp. 289–336.
14. Dunning, J.H. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.
15. Ethier, W.J. (1982). “National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade”, American Economic Review, Vol, 72, pp. 389–405.
16. Findlay, R. (1978). “Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 92, pp. 1-16.
17. Franco, Ch. and Sasidharan, S. (2010). ”MNEs, Technological Efforts and Channels of Export Spillover: An Analysis of Indian Manufacturing Industries”, Economic Systems, Vol. 34, pp. 270–288.
18. Francois, Joseph F. and Reinert, K.A. (1997). “Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis: An Overview”, in J.F. Francois and K.A. Reinert, Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis: A Handbook, Cambridge University Press: New York.
19. Girma, S. (2005). “Absorptive Capacity and Productivity Spillovers from 

FDI: A Threshold Regression Analyses”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, pp. 281-306.
20. Girma, S. and Gorg, H. (2005). ”Foreign Direct Investment, Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from Quintile Regressions”. Discussion Paper, No.13.
21. Glass, Amy Jocelyn and Saggi, K. (1998). "International Technology Transfer and the Technology Gap”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 55, pp. 369-398.
22. Gorg, H and Greenaway, D. (2004). “Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?” World Bank Research Observer, Vol, 19. pp.171–97.
23. Gorg, H. and Strobl, E. (2004). “Foreign Direct Investment and Local Economic Development: Beyond Productivity Spillovers”, GEP Research Paper, The University of Nottingham, No. 11.
24. Gorg, H., and Strobl, E. (2001). “Multinational Companies and Technology Spillovers: A Meta-Analysis”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 111. pp. 723–739.
25. Greenaway, D. and Kneller, R. (2008). ”Exporting, Productivity and Agglomeration”, European Economic Review, Vol. 52, pp. 919–939.
26. Greenaway, D., Sousa, N. and Wakelin, K. (2004). “Do Domestic Firms Learn to Export From Multinationals?”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 20, pp. 1027-43.
27. Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991). “Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy”, Cambridge: MIT Press.
28. Hayami, Y and Ruttan, V.W. (1985). Agricultural development. An international perspective, Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.
29. Hertel, T.W. (1997). Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.
30. Javorcik, B.S. (2004). ”Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages”, American Economic Review, Vol.94, pp.605-627.
31. Keller, W. (2004). “International technology diffusion”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol, 42, pp. 752–782.
32. Keller, W. and Yeaple, S.R. (2003). “Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-Level Evidence from the United States”, NBER Working Papers, No, 9504.
33. Kinoshita, Y. (2000). “R&D and Technology Spillovers via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity”, Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School, No, 349.
34. Lall, S. (1980). "Monopolistic Advantages and Foreign Involvement by U.S. Manufacturing Industry, "Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, Vol. 32, pp. 102-22.

35. Law, M.T. (2000). ”Productivity and Economic Performance: An Overview of the Issues”, Public Policy Sources, No. 37.
36. Maskus, Keith E. (2004). “Encouraging International Technology Transfer”, ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, University of Colorado, USA.
37. McDougall, R.A. (1995). “Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: Introduction and Overview, “Asia Pacific Economic Review, Vol. 1, pp. 88-91.
38. Meyer, K. (2003). “FDI Spillovers in Emerging Markets: A Literature Review and New Perspectives”, Copenhagen Business School, Working Paper, No. 15.
39. Mohnen, P. (1994). “The Econometric Approach to R&D Externalities”, Cahiers Derecherche duDepartement Des Sciences Economiques De l'UQAM, No. 9408.
40. Narjoko, D. (2009). ” Foreign Presence Spillovers and Firms’ Export Response: Evidence from the Indonesian Manufacturing”, ERIA Discussion Paper Series, No. 23.
41. Santikarn, M. (1981). Technology Transfer, Singapore University Press.
42. Shimizu, M. et al. (1997). “Value Added Productivity Measurement and its Practical Applications”, Japan Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Development.
43. Shoven, J. and Whalley, J. (1984). “Applied General-Equilibrium Models of Taxation and International Trade: An Introduction and Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol, 22, pp. 1007-1051.
44. Van Meijl, H. (1995). Endogenous Technological Change: The Case of Information Technology: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results, Universities Press Maastricht.
45. Van Meijl, H. (1997). “Measuring Intersectoral Spillovers: French Evidence”, Economic Systems Research, Vol.9, No.1, pp. 27-48.
46. Van Meijl, H., Van Tongeren, F. (1998). “Trade, Technology Spillovers, and Food Production in China”, Weltwirtschaftliches Arch. Band, Vol, 134, pp. 443-449.
47. Westphalia, L.E. (1982). “Fostering Technological Masteryby Means of Selective Infant Industry Protection,” In Syrequin, & S. Title (Eds.), Trade, Stability, Technology, and Equity in Latin America, New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 255–279.