Analyzing the Effectiveness of Fiscal Decentralization in Economic Growth: The Role of Institutions

Authors

1 Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan

2 School of Business, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China

Abstract

Decentralization is expected, theoretically, to be a route to efficient provision of the local public services. This efficient utilization of scarce resources is further expected to boost economic growth. Despite solid theoretical footings, the existing empirical literature presents mixed results for the presumed positive relationship between decentralization and economic growth. It is important to note here that the second-generation theories of fiscal federalism talk about the enabling environment for decentralization to yield positive results; talking explicitly, an enabling institutional setup is required. Therefore, the current study examines the complementarity between fiscal decentralization and institutions stimulating growth. A sumptuous cross-country panel data from 1990 to 2018 is used for analysis. Results suggest that fiscal decentralization and institutions both are instrumental in economic growth, and there is complementarity between the two. However, over-exposure of local representatives seems to divert their attention from service provision to countering opponents’ strategies.

Keywords


Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A., & Woren, D. (2012). Why Nations Fail: the Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty (4). New York: Crown Business.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution (w8460). National Bureau of Economic Research, Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w8460/w8460.pdf
Ahmad, M., & Hall, S. G. (2012). Do Institutions Matter for Growth? Evidence from East Asian Countries. MPRA Paper Series, 42158, Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/42158/1/MPRA_paper_42158.pdf
Akai, N., & Sakata, M. (2002). Fiscal Decentralization Contributes to Economic Growth: Evidence from State-level Cross-section Data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 93-108.
Baltagi, B. H., & Wu, P. X. (1999). Unequally Spaced Panel Data Regressions with AR (1) Disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15(6), 814-823.
Barro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 108-125.
Baskaran, T., & Feld, L. P. (2009). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in OECD Countries Is There a Relationship? Working Paper, 2721, Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1091142112463726
Chishti, M. (In press). Analysis of the Nexus between Demographic Changes and Economic Growth in Pakistan: Role of Capital Stock. Iranian Economic Review, Retrieved from https://ier.ut.ac.ir/article_76529.html
Chishti, M. Z., Ullah, S., & Ozturk, I. (2020). Examining the Asymmetric Effects of Globalization and Tourism on Pollution Emissions in South Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 27721–27737.
Canavire-Bacarreza, G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Yedgenov, B. (2020). Identifying and Disentangling the Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth. World Development, Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/208190/1/IDB-WP-1037.pdf
Ding, Y., McQuoid, A., & Karayalcin, C. (2019). Fiscal Decentralization, Fiscal Reform, and Economic Growth in China. China Economic Review, 53, 152-167.
Davoodi, H., & Zou, H. F. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross Country Study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43(2), 244-257.
Elheddad, M., Djellouli, N., Tiwari, A. K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2020). The Relationship between Energy Consumption and Fiscal Decentralization and the Importance of Urbanization: Evidence from Chinese Provinces. Journal of Environmental Management, Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479720304084
Helliwell, J. F. (1994). Empirical Linkages between Democracy and Economic Growth. British Journal of Political Science, 24(02), 225-248.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519-530.
ICRG. (2014). International Country Risk Guide. Retrieved from The Political Risk Services (PRS).
Iimi, A. (2005). Decentralization and Economic Growth Revisited: An Empirical Note. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(3), 449-461.
Iqbal, N. (2013). Fiscal Decentralization, Macroeconomic Stability and Economic Growth (Doctoral Dissertation). Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.
Iqbal, N., Din, M. U., & Ghani, E. (2013). Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Role of Democratic Institutions. Retrieved from http://thepdr.pk/pdr/index.php/pdr/article/download/2516/2516
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross‐country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Economics & Politics, 7(3), 207-227.
Malik, S., Mahmood-ul-Hassan, &Hussain, S. (2006). Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 45(4), 845-854.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712.
Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2003). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth. World Development, 31(9), 1597-1616.
Nawaz, S. (2015). Growth Effects of Institutions: A Disaggregated Analysis. Economic Modelling, 45, 118-126.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 349-373.
---------- (1995). Comment on ‘Conflicts and Dilemmas of Decentralization’, by Rudolf Hommes. In Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC: World Bank.
---------- (1993). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Development. National Tax Journal, 46(2), 237-243.
---------- (1985). Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical Study. The American Economic Review, 75(4), 748-757.
---------- (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Olson, M. (1969). The Principle of Fiscal Equivalence: the Division of Responsibilities among Different Levels of Government. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 479-487.
Podobnik, B., Shao, J., Njavro, D., Ivanov, P., & Stanley, H. E. (2008). Influence of Corruption on Economic Growth Rate and Foreign Investment. The European Physical Journal B, 63(4), 547–550.
Potrafke, N. (2011). Intelligence and Corruption. Economics Letters, 114(1), 109-112.
Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What they are and How to Acquire Them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 3-31.
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., &Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions Rule: the Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-165.
Sarwar, K., Afzal, M., Shafiq, M., & Rehman, H. (2013). Institutions and Economic Growth in South Asia. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 9(2), 1–23.
Tanzi, V. (1996). Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects (295-316). In Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424.
Vijayaraghavan, M., & Ward, W. A. (2001). Institutions and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from A Cross-National Analysis. Centre for International Trade Working Paper, 1302, Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/5cfae33383b20df1dd014e212e4245d6/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Ullah, S., Chishti, M. Z., & Majeed, M. T. (2020). The Asymmetric Effects of Oil Price Changes on Environmental Pollution: Evidence from the Top Ten Carbon Emitters. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 29623–29635.
WDI. (2014). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from World Bank.
Yilmaz, S. (1999). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Macroeconomic Performance. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, 92, 251-260.