Economic Competitiveness and Environmental Policy: An Application of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek (HOV) Model

Document Type: Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor at Shahid Ashrafi Esfahani University, Esfahan, Iran

Abstract

The relationship between trade liberalisation and the environment has been the subject of a growing body of literature in recent years. As can be seen from the differing assessment of instrument types for environmental protection, one of the important factors for the relationship between environmental protection and economic competitiveness are regulatory stringency and efficiency. This concerns e.g. performance versus ambient standards, sale technology versus clean technology/clean production, process change versus demand side measures, legislation versus economic instruments. The model based on the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek (HOV) model and I focus on the issue of whether environmental regulations influence patterns of the nine Mediterranean developed countries region’s international trade over 2000–2013. The results indicate that more environmental policy stringency in the region decrease net exports.

Keywords


1- Albrecht, J., (1998), Environmental regulation, comparative advantage and the Porter hypothesis, FEEM Nota di Lavoro, 17.99.
2- Albrecht, J., (1998a), Environmental Policy and Inward Investment Position of U.S. Dirty Industries, Inter-economics, July/August, 186-94.
3- Alpay, S., (2000), Does Trade Always Harm the Global Environment? A Case for Positive Interaction, Oxford Economic Papers, 52, 272-288.
4- Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., Taylor, M.S., (1998), Is Free Trade Good for the Environment, NBER Working Paper Series, No: 6707.
5- Baltagi, B. H., (2006), Estimating an economic model of crime using panel data from North Carolina, Journal of Applied Economics, 21: 543–547.
6- Baumert, K.A. and Kate, N., (2002), An architecture for climate protection. Published in building on the Kyoto Protocol: options for protecting the climate, World Resources Institute, available on line at http://climate.wri.org/pubs_pdf.cfm?PubID=3762 (30/10/2005).
7- Bowen, H., (1983), Changes in the International Distribution of Resources and Their Impact on US Comparative Advantage, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 65:402-414.
8- Busse, Matthias, (2004), Trade, environmental regulations and the World Trade Organization: new empirical evidence, Policy Research Working Paper Series 3361, The World Bank.
9- Copeland, B.R. and Taylor, M.S., (2003), Trade, Growth and the Environment, Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71.
10- Dessus, S. and Bussolo, M., (1998), Is There a Trade-off between Trade Liberalization and Pollution Abatement? A CGE Assessment Applied to Costa Rica, Journal of Policy Modelling, 20, 11-31.
11- Ekins, P., Folke, C. and Costanza, R., (1994), Trade, Environment and Development: The Issues in Perspective, Ecological Economics, 9, special issue.
12- Frankel, J. and Rose, A., (2002), In Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting out the Causality, NBER Working Paper No. 9021. NBER Research Associates.
13- Frankel, J.A. and Rose, A.K., (2002), Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, N.9201.

14- Jaffe, A. and Palmer, K., (1997), Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 610-619.
15- Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R. & Stavins, R. N., (1995), Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.23 (March 1995): 132-163.
16- Jaffe, A., Peterson, S., Portney, P. and Stavins, R., (1995), Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What does the Evidence tell Us?, Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 132-63.
17- Leamer, E. E., (1984), Sources of International Comparative Advantage: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18- List, John And Co, Catherine (2000), The Effects of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(1), pp. 1-20.
19- Macrory, Patrick F.J. Appleton, Arthur E. and Plummer, Michael G., (2005), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis,vol. 2. New York: Springer, pp. 137-170.
20- McGuire, M., (1982), Regulation, Factor Rewards, and International Trade, Journal of Public Economics, 17: 335-354.
21- Pesaran, M., (2004), General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panel, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435 Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
22- Pethig, R., (1976), Pollution, Welfare and Environmental Policy in the Theory of Comparative Advantage, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2,160-169.
23- Porter, M. and Linde, C. van der (1995), Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97-118.
24- Shortle, J. S. and Abler, D., (2001), Environmental Policies for Agricultural Pollution Control, CAB International Publishing, New York.
25- Siebert, H., (1977), Environmental Quality and the Gains from Trade, Kyklos, 30(4): 657-673.
26- Stewart, R. B., (1993), Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness, Yale Law Journal, June, 102(8): 2039-2106.

27- Tobey, J., (1990), The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World trade: an Empirical Test, Kyklos, 43(2): 191-209.
28- Tobey, J.A., (1993), Effects of Domestic Environmental Policy on Patterns of International Trade, Shane, M.D. and H. van Witzke eds., The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade: A Proceedings, USDA: Staff Report No. AGES 9314.
29- World Trade Organization (WTO) (1999). Special Studies –Trade and Environment.