Estimating Property Rights Expenditures in Iran

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate in Dept. of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

There are many indices for measuring property rights (PR) security. They may be classified into two groups: subjective proxies and objective proxies. Most of the proxies are subjective. One contribution of this paper is introducing a new approach for measuring government expenditures devoted to PR protection. Calculating physical capital within the introduced new approach is another contribution of this paper. Finally, the proposed approach is applied for measuring PR and physical capital in Iran.

Keywords


  1. Acemoglo, D., and S. Johnson 2005. Unbundling institutions. The Journal of Political Economy 113(5), 949-995.
  2. Aron, J. 2000. Growth and institutions: A Review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer 15(1), 99-135.
  3. Anderson, J.E., Bandiera, O., 2005. Private enforcement and social efficiency. Journal of Development Economics 77, 341–366.
  4. Azarbaijani, K., Raki, M., Homayoon, R. 2011. The effect of export diversification on total productivity of production and economic growth factors (panel data approach in D8 countries), Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research 3,165-201.
  5. Clague, C., P. Keefer, S. Knack, and M. Olson 1996. Property and contract rights in Autocracies and Democracies. Journal of Economic Growth 1,243-276.
  6. Clague, C., P. Keefer, S. Knack, and M. Olson 1999.  Contract- Intensive money: contract enforcement property rights, and economic performance.  Journal of Economic Growth 4, 185-211.
  7. Deliri, H., and Renani, M. 2010. How does social capital enter production function? Designing a theoretical model and its test in the framework of an endogenous growth model, Iranian Journal of Adoptive Economy 1(1), 41-68.
  8. Dincer, O. C. 2007. The effects of property rights on economic performance. Applied Economics 39(7), 825-839.
  9. Dincer, O.C., Ellis, C.J., 2005. Predation, protection, and accumulation: endogenous property rights in an overlapping generations (OLG) growth model. International Tax and Public Finance 12, 435–455.
    1. Fedderke, J.W., R. H. J. de Kadt, and J. M. Luiz 2001. Indicators of political liberty, property rights and political instability in South Africa: 1935-97. International Review of Law and Economic 21103-139.
    2. Gonzales, F.M., 2007. Effective Property Rights, Conflict and Growth. Journal of Economic Theory 137, 127–139.
    3. Gradstein, M., 2004. Governance and growth. Journal of Development Economics 73, 505–518.
    4. Grossman, H.J., 2001. The creation of effective property rights. AEA Papers and Proceedings 91 (2), 347–352.
    5. Grossman, H.I., Kim, M., 1996. Predation and accumulation. Journal of Economic Growth 1, 333–350.
    6. Hadian, E. and Ostadzad A.H. 2013. Estimating the Optimal Pollution Tax for Iranian Economy, Journal of Research in Economic Growth and Development, 12, 57-74
    7. Haupt, R. L. and Haupt, S. E.  1996 Practical Genetic Algorithms, Second Edition, A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication.
    8. Keefer, P., Knack, S., 2002. Polarization, politics and property rights and growth. Public Choice 111, 127–154.
    9. Law, S. H. 2006. Institutional development and economic performance: dynamic panel date evidence. Staff Paper, No.1, University Putra Malaysia.
    10. Lindner, I., Strulik, H., 2004. Why not Africa? Growth and welfare effects of secure property rights. Public Choice 120 (1/2), 143–167.
    11. Mahmoodzade, M. 2010. The effect of ICT on total factor productivity in developing countries, Iranian Journal of Trade Studies 57, 29-64.
    12. Mino, K., 2006. Voracity vs. scale effect in a growing economy without secure property rights. Economic Letters 93, 278–284.
    13. Moshiri, S., and Nikpour, S. 2007. The effect of IT and its spillover on economic growth of the countries in the world, Iranian Journal of Economic Research 9(33), 75-103.
    14. Norton, S. W. 2000.The Cost of diversity: Endogenous property rights and growth. Constitutional Political Economy 11(4), 319-337.
    15. Pazhuyan, J., and Fagihnasiri, M. 2009. The effect of competition on economic growth with approach of endogenous growth model, Iranian Journal of Economic Research 13(38) ,97-132. 
    16. Palda, F., 1999. Property rights vs. redistribution: which path to national wealth? Public Choice 101, 129–145.
    17. Rennani, M., Dallali Isfahan, L., Samadi, A.H., 2008. Property rights and economic growth: an endogenous growth model. Tahgheghat-e-eghtesadi 43 (85), 175–206.
    18. Samadi A. H, Ostadzad, A. H. (2013), Optimum share of public and private sectors in property rights, protection: An augmented endogenous growth model, Economic Modelling, 33, 947–955.
    19. Samadi, A. H., 2008. Property rights and economic growth: an endogenous growth model. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Isfahan, Iran.
    20. Sanogo, R. 2003. The effects of insecure property rights on investment and economic growth in Sub-Saharan-African countries. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
    21. Svensson, J., 1998. Investment, property rights and political instability: theory and evidence. European Economic Review 42, 1317–1341.
    22. Sylwester, K., 2001. A model of institutional formation within a rent seeking environment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 44, 169–176.
    23. Teng, J., 2000. Endogenous authoritarian property rights. Journal of Public Economics 77, 81–95.
    24. Tornell, A., Lane, P.R., 1999. The voracity effect. The American Economic Review 89 (1), 22–46.
    25. Tornell, A., Velasco, A., 1992. The tragedy of commons and economic growth: why does capital flow from poor to rich countries? Journal of Political Economy 100 (6), 1208–1231.
    26. Vafinajar, D. 2005. Statistical analysis and investigating causal relationship between GDP and energy consumption, calculating institutional elasticity of energy by production function, Energy Economics Studies 5, 55-73.