Openness and Government Size: Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries

Author

Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria

Abstract

Over the years, African countries have implemented various economic liberalization reforms. The impact of such policy reforms on government size has remained a contentious issue in the literature. Thus, this study examined the relationship between openness and government size in Sub-Saharan African countries. The study covered twenty-one African countries over the period 2001 to 2019. Specifically, the study examined the validity of the compensation and efficiency hypotheses concerning Sub-Saharan African countries. The study's findings did not support the existence of both the compensation and the efficiency hypotheses. Also, it was observed that financial openness slightly influenced the relationship between trade openness and government size in Sub-Saharan African countries. Thus, the study concludes that the compensated and the efficiency hypotheses do not hold for Sub-Saharan African countries.

Keywords

References

Agyemang, E. (2014). Economic Growth, Income Inequality and Poverty Reduction: A Regional Comparative Analysis (Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Lethbridge, Canada).
Aregbeyen, O., & Ibrahim, T. M. (2014). Trade Openness-Government Size Nexus: Compensation Hypothesis Considered for Nigeria. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 39, 364-372.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51.
Aydogus, I., & Topcu. M. (2013). An Investigation of Co-Integration and Causality between Trade Openness and Government Size in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(2), 319-323.
Benarroch, M., & Pandey, M. (2008). Trade Openness and Government Size. Economics Letters, 101, 157-159.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143.
Bretschger, L., & Hettich, F. (2002). Globalisation, Capital Mobility and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 18(4), 695-716.
De Mendonca, H. F., & De Oliveira, A. J. (2019). Openness and Government Size: A New Empirical Assessment. Economic Bulletin, 39(2), 982-995.
Dixit, V. (2014). Relation between Trade Openness, Capital Openness and Government Size in India: An Application of Bounds Testing-ARDL Approach to Co- integration. Foreign Trade Review, 49(1), 1-29.
Farhad, M., & Jetter, M. (2019). On the Relationship between Trade Openness and Government Size. CESifo Working Paper, 7832, Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3467965
Fosu, K. A. (2017). Growth, Inequality and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries: Recent Global Evidence. Research in Economics, 71(2), 306-336.
Galí, J. (1994). Government Size and Macroeconomic Stability. European Economic Review, 38, 117–132.
Garrett, G. (1995). Capital Mobility, Trade and the Domestic Politics of Economic Policy. International Organisation, 49(4), 657-687.
Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., & Rosen, H. S. (1988). Estimating Vector Auto-Regressions with Panel Data. Econometrica, 56(6), 1371-1395.
Im, S. K., Pesaran, H. M., & Shin. Y. (2003). Testing Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
Katumba, C. O. (2013). Globalization and Government Size: Adopting the Mean Group Estimator Model (Unpublished Master's Thesis). KDI School of Public Policy and Management, South Korea.
Kavya, T. B., & Shijin, S. (2020). Economic Development, Financial Development, and Income Inequality Nexus. Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(1), 80-93.
Kimakova, A. (2009). Government Size and Openness Revisited: The Case of Financial Globalization. KYKLOS, 62(3), 394 - 406.
Lamartina, S., & Zaghini. A. (2010). Increasing Public Expenditures: Wagner's Law in OECD Countries. German Economic Review, 12(2), 149-164.
Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu. C. S. (2002). Unit Root Test in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
Liberati, P. (2007). Trade Openness, Capital Openness and Government Size. Journal of Public Policy, 27, 215-247.
Maluleke, G. (2017). The Determinants of Government Expenditure: Analysis of the Empirical Literature from 1995 to 2016. Acta Univetrsitatis Danubius, 13(2), 212-219.
Masson, R. P. (2000). Fiscal Policy and Growth in the Context of European Integration. IMF, Working Paper, 133, Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=3700
Mohanty, S. M., & Zampoli, F. (2009). Government Size and Macroeconomic Stability. BIS Quarterly Review, Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt0912g.pdf
Nahidi, M. M., Parvizkhanlou, K. J., & Arash, B. K. (2013). An Impact of Trade and Financial-Openness on Government Size: A Case Study for ECO. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science, 1(8), 1013-1017.
Nwaka, D. I., & Onifade, S. T. (2015). Government Size, Openness and Income Risk Nexus: New Evidence from Some African Countries. African Governance Development Institute Working Paper, WP/15/056, Retrieved from          https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:agd:wpaper:15/056
Olawole, K., & Adebayo, T. (2017). Openness and Government Size: The Compensation and Efficiency Hypotheses Considered for Nigeria. MPRA Paper, Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/82022/1/MPRA_paper_82022.pdf
Parvizkhanlou, K. J. (2014). An Impact of Trade and Financial Openness on Government Size: A Case Study for ECO. IRC'S International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Social & Management Sciences, 2(2), 1-4.
Piper, A. T. (2014). The Benefits, Challenges and Insights of a Dynamic Panel Assessment of Life Satisfaction. MPRA Paper, 59556, Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni.muenchen.de/59556/1/MPRA_paper_59556.pdf
Quinn, D. (1997). The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation. American Political Science Review, 91, 531-552.
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why Do More Open Economics Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997-1032.
Roodman, D. (2009). How to Do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.
Schulze, G., & Ursprung. H. W. (1999). Globalization of the Economy and the Nation State. The World Economy, 22, 295-352.
Shahbaz, H. M, Hafeez, R. U., & Amir, H. (2010). The Impact of Trade and Financial Openness on Government Size: A Case Study of Pakistan. Journal of Quality and Technology, VI(1), 105-118.
Swank, D. (2002). Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turan, T., & Karakas, M. (2016). The Effect of Trade Openness and Income on the Size of a Government. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 47(5), 164-178.
Xavier, D., Jean, P-F., & Andre, S. (2008). Government Size and Output Volatility: Should We Forsake Automatic Stabilization? IMF Working Paper, WP/08/122, Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=21947
Iranian Economic Review
Volume 26, Issue 3
September 2022
Pages 525-534

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics