Testing Piketty’s Hypothesis in Analyzing Factors Affecting Income Inequality in Iran: Stock-Flow Consistent (SFC) Approach

Authors

1 Department of Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar Branch, Shoushtar, Iran

Abstract

Reducing inequality and establishing social justice by balancing the distribution of income and wealth is one of the main concerns of economic policymakers which has been emphasized in the constitution in Iran. Explaining the relationship between inequality and its causes has been one of the most challenging areas of economic debate in the recent decades; despite extensive research in this area, there are still many ambiguous issues in this regard. In recent years, new hypotheses have been proposed by the French economist, Thomas Piketty on the main causes of the spread of inequality. In his analysis, he considers the gap between the rate of return on capital and the rate of economic growth (r-g) to be the main causes of inequality. However, despite providing logical explanations consistent with changes in inequality patterns, he has not conducted any empirical tests for its scientific-theoretical chain. Therefore, these question arise as to how empirically verifiable the Piketty hypothesis is and is it able to explain the increase in inequality of different countries? For this purpose, a Stock-Flow Consistent (SFC) model was used as a first model in the present study to investigate the relationship between inequality and growth in a macroeconomic framework of Iran. This model tests the conclusions and Piketty assumptions for the Iranian economy when changing key parameters. The results of this model showed that under certain circumstances with decreasing growth rate, income inequality increases. However, the analysis proved that there are no inevitable conditions under which a reduction in the growth rate will lead to a sharp increase in the level of inequality.

Keywords

References

Abounouri, E., Shahmoradi, A., Taghi Nezhad Omran, V. & Rajaie, M. H., (2014). The Macroeconomic Effects of Energy Price Shocks: Introducing a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model. Quarterly Energy Economics Review, 9(39), 1-19 (In Persian).
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). The Rise and Decline of General Laws of Capitalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1), 3-28.
Chirinko, R. S. (2008). σ: The Long and Short of it. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30(2), 671-686.
Copeland, M. A. (1949). Social Accounting for Money Flows. The Accounting Review, 24(3), 254-264.
Dorman, P. (2014). Macroeconomics: A Fresh Start. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Facchini, F., & Couvreur, S. (2015). Inequality: The Original Economic Sin of Capitalism? An Evaluation of Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century. European Journal of Political Economy, 39, 281-287.
Facchini, F., & Melki, M. (2013). Efficient government size: France in the 20th European Journal of Political Economy, 31, 1-14.
Farzinvash, A., Ehsani, M. A., & Keshavarz, H. (2015). Financial Frictions and Labor Market Fluctuations (Case Study: Iran's Economy as a Small Open Economy). Tahghighat-e Eghtesadi, 50(2), 145-447 (In Persian).
Fotros, M., & Dalaei Milan, A. (2017). Examination of Underground Economy and Tax Evasion within the Framework of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models (DSGE). Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 7(25), 65-84 (In Persian).
Góes, C. (2016). Testing Piketty’s Hypothesis on the Drivers of Income Inequality: Evidence from Panel VARs with Heterogeneous Dynamics. Retrieved from International Monetary Fund.
Goldey, W., & Lavoie, M. (2007). Fiscal Policy in a Stock-flow Consistent (SFC) Model. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30(1), 79-100.
Hartley, T., van den Bergh, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Policies for Equality under Low or No Growth: A Model Inspired by Piketty. Review of Political Economy, 32(2), 243-258.
Hiraguchi, R. (2019). Wealth Inequality, or r–g, in the Economic Growth Model. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 23(2), 479-488.
Jackson, T., & Victor, P. A. (2016). Does Slow Growth Lead to Rising Inequality? Some Theoretical Reflections and Numerical Simulations. Ecological Economics, 121, 206-219.
Jackson, T., Drake, B., Victor, P., Kratena, K., & Sommer, M. (2014). Foundations for an Ecological Macroeconomics. Literature Review and Model Development. WWW for Europe Working Paper, Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/125724/1/WWWforEurope_WPS_no065_MS38.pdf
Jones, C. I. (2015). Pareto and Piketty: The Macroeconomics of Top Income and Wealth Inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1), 29-46.
Kaldor, N. (1956). Indian Tax Reform: Report of a Survey. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40909244
Kalecki, M. (1939). Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations. Retrieved from https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315016818&type=googlepdf
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
Krugman, P. (2014). Four Observations on Secular Stagnation. Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes and Cures. Retrieved from http://pratclif.com/2015/secular-stagnation_files/vox-krugman.pdf
Krusell, P., & Smith Jr, A. A. (2015). Is Piketty’s “Second Law of Capitalism” Fundamental? Journal of Political Economy, 123(4), 725-748.
Mankiw, N. G. (2015). Yes, r> g. So what? American Economic Review, 105(5), 43-47.
McCloskey, D. N. (2014). Measured, Unmeasured, Mismeasured, and Unjustified Pessimism: A Review Essay of Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 7(2), 73-115.
Milanovic, B. (2014). The Return of "Patrimonial Capitalism": A Review of ThomasPiketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 519-34.
Milanovic, B. (2016). Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Milgrom, P. R., North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1990). The Role of Institutions in theRevival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the ChampagneEconomics & Politics, 2(1), 1-23.
Ng, Y. K. (2015). Is an Increasing Capital Share under Capitalism Inevitable? European Journal of Political Economy, 38, 82-86.
ONS. (2014). Wealth and Income 2010–2012. Statistical Bulletin, Office for National Statistics, Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_368612.pdf
Pereira, C. (2003). Empirical Essays on the Elasticity of Substitution, Technical Change, and Economic Growth. Retrieved from http://repository.lib. ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/4460/1/etd.pdf
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Trans. by A. Goldhammer). Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rognlie, M. (2014). A Note on Piketty and Diminishing Returns to Capital. Retrieved from http://gesd.free.fr/rognlie14.pdf
Rubin, A., & Segal, D. (2015). The Effects of Economic Growth on Income Inequality inthe U.S. Journal of Macroeconomics, 45, 258-273.
Sarkhosh-Sara, A., Nasrollahi, K., Azarbayjani, K., & Dastjerdi, R. B. (2020). Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Institutional Factors and Piketty’s Hypothesis on Inequality: Evidence from a Panel of Countries. Journal of Economic Structures, 9(1), 1-28.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). New Theoretical Perspectives on the Distribution of Income and Wealth among Individuals: Part IV: Land and Credit (w21192). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research.
Summers, L. H. (2014). The Inequality Puzzle. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 33(2), 65-73.
Tavakolian, H. (2012). A New Keynesian Phillips Curve in a DSGE Model for Iran. Tahghighat-e Eghtesadi, 47(3), 1-22 (in Persian).
Van Treeck, T. (2015). r > g: Why the ‘Piketty Debate’ Unsettles Germany’s EconomicCESifo Forum, 16(1), 26-34.
Wolff, E., & Zacharias, A. (2007). Class Structure and Economic Inequality. Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper, Retrieved from http:// levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_487.pdf
Iranian Economic Review
Volume 26, Issue 3
September 2022
Pages 611-636

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics